The now-deposed TCI Premier, Michael Misick (center); Photo: Foreign & Commonwealth Office
As many of their neighbors celebrate 40 years or more of independence, residents of the Turks & Caicos woke up this morning to learn that their islands have become a colony… again.
Nobody says postcolonialism’s been easy.
To go from a state of dependence to one of autonomy with little support has proven understandably challenging for many of Europe’s former colonial states, especially the small islands of the Caribbean. And in the age of globalization, which has prompted a form of economic neo-colonialism, fledgling independent governments have struggled to develop infrastructure, support, and services for their citizens.
Economies have hiccuped as traditional sources of labor and income have disappeared in the past decade, prompting many countries to focus almost exclusively on tourism as an industry (which was fine until the global economic crisis hit, literally shuttering hotels on some of the smaller islands).
With all the challenges, though, few of the newly independent nations have been interested in reverting back to colonial status. That’s just what happened today in the Turks and Caicos Islands, though local news reflects widespread discontent with the action, which resulted in the suspension of the TCI’s Constitution and the dismissal of the islands’ House of Assembly.
It’s true that the Turks and Caicos have been undergoing political challenges that may be unique: the government has been accused of rampant corruption and the economy has been in a shambles. But critics charge that the TCI haven’t received the support they need to really achieve independence in the fullest sense of the word, and that the rollback to colonialism is punitive and infantilizing.
“The move is a smack in the face of democracy and a backward step to colonialism.”
A British governor, Gordon Wetherell, was appointed to serve as head of government; Wetherell, in turn, has begun appointing other Brits for key government positions, including chief executive of TCI public service. “Belongers” (locals) will be appointed to serve on an Advisory Council and a Consultative Forum, though the functions and specific level of influence these entities will have are not yet clear.
The move is a “smack in the face of democracy” and a “backward step to colonialism,” according to Rosalind Cummings-Yeates, a Chicago-based travel writer who commented about the take-over on Twitter.
Community Connection:
Learn more about colonialism, postcolonialism, and independence movements in the Caribbean:
U.S. House of Reps Approves Proposal to Consider Puerto Rico’s Status
About the Author
More By This Author
- Matador Meets the New York Times & The Sunday Telegraph (5 comments)
- Meet a Matador Editor: Carlo Alcos (15 comments)
- Anna Brones Launches a Social Media Start-Up (8 comments)
Related Posts
6 Comments... join the discussion!
-
-
Eva-
It’s an interesting situation. You’re right– they were never “independent”– at least not wholly independent in the way that some of the other island nations were; however, I suppose the status of TCI is somewhat akin to Puerto Rico’s status vis-a-vis the US: pseudo-independence.
The take on this change, at least what I can gather from the TCI press, though, is that the dissolution of the TCI’s own legislative branch and the dismissal of at least a portion of its constitution is being considered a retrocession and an exercise of neocolonialist power.
There’s much more background, surely, and many other factors likely to complicate the situation and (certainly) my understanding of it. Will be interesting to follow.
↵ -
Thank goodness Misick is out of office – he was horribly corrupt, among other faults, and I applaud the British for stepping in to clean things up.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/11/michael-misick-turks-caic_n_96258.html
↵ -
Corrupt? Absolutely. Not to mention immoral and unfit for office.
But I’m not sure I support the British impulse to go in and “clean up”– not according to the plan that seems to be taking shape. Providing support to help a country govern itself is one thing and reinserting your own figureheads into office is another. I’d like to see a solution that’s a bit more nuanced.↵ -
I hear you, Julie, but I think the situation has progressed beyond the point where a nuanced solution would work.
↵ -
TCI Journal is a great resource, btw.
↵
