Thanks for your feedback.

I agree with you, and I think it’s important for everyone involved to realize that the folks who are making these videos (just like folks who submit reviews on TripAdvisor) are not professionals. Yet they are, in effect, getting “paid” for their “work” with an expenses-paid vacation.

Professionals recognize that there are ethical implications of accepting press trips–even when they FAIL to consider those implications. We’ve been having some great content produced on Matador about this subject, including:

http://thetravelersnotebook.com/top-10-lists/10-steps-to-surviving-your-first-press-trip/

http://matadortravel.com/travel-blog/grenada/jgbrandt/the-first-press-trip

and

http://thetravelersnotebook.com/photography-q-a/top-5-secrets-travel-writers-wont-tell-you/

(Report comment)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

In some ways, I agree that this new marketing campaign is akin to the press trip; however, I think that there are some important distinctions.

The kinds of people profiled in the USA Today article and who are being contacted by marketing reps are not, in most cases, professional writers or videographers. Thus, they’re less likely to be aware of the ethical implications of accepting a free vacation in exchange for producing a video that will be uploaded to YouTube. Professional writers know, for instance, that there are inherent ethical issues to be considered– even when they FAIL to consider them!

For some more great insight on this topic, check out http://thetravelersnotebook.com/top-10-lists/10-steps-to-surviving-your-first-press-trip/

http://matadortravel.com/travel-blog/grenada/jgbrandt/the-first-press-trip

and

http://thetravelersnotebook.com/photography-q-a/top-5-secrets-travel-writers-wont-tell-you/

(Report comment)

But is a blogger, or an amateur video-you tube star a journalist, a writer, a professional?

I get invited to attend family “vacations” to check out resorts, filled with giftees and perks. I don’t particularly like them, but will go on one now and then. The difference is that if something ain’t right, I tell it like it is or don’t cover the property

Regardless of how much I have been pampered and expensed. I have gone on trips that I have just not written about because thy are not “where they should be” as a destination. The properties, by offering these things to non-professionals they are manipulating the viral coverage they get.

As a professional, I can only hope that this trend will also pass. Perks are a part of the business. But when you consider what it takes to get a good story, time and energy wise both on travel and in writing it up, the professional is a far cry from the amateur.

There is room for both, there will have to be. I am however looking for journalists for my publication.

And yes, properties are going to exploit for positive viral coverage.

Just one more thing to deal with.

Jacquie Kubin
Editor
Donne Tempo Magazine
http://www.donnetempo.com

(Report comment)

Thanks for your feedback.

I agree with you, and I think it's important for everyone involved to realize that the folks who are making these videos (just like folks who submit reviews on TripAdvisor) are not professionals. Yet they are, in effect, getting "paid" for their "work" with an expenses-paid vacation.

Professionals recognize that there are ethical implications of accepting press trips–even when they FAIL to consider those implications. We've been having some great content produced on Matador about this subject, including:

http://thetravelersnotebook.com/top-10-lists/10-s...
http://matadortravel.com/travel-blog/grenada/jgbr...
and

http://thetravelersnotebook.com/photography-q-a/t...

(Report comment)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

In some ways, I agree that this new marketing campaign is akin to the press trip; however, I think that there are some important distinctions.

The kinds of people profiled in the USA Today article and who are being contacted by marketing reps are not, in most cases, professional writers or videographers. Thus, they're less likely to be aware of the ethical implications of accepting a free vacation in exchange for producing a video that will be uploaded to YouTube. Professional writers know, for instance, that there are inherent ethical issues to be considered– even when they FAIL to consider them!

For some more great insight on this topic, check out http://thetravelersnotebook.com/top-10-lists/10-s...
http://matadortravel.com/travel-blog/grenada/jgbr...
and

http://thetravelersnotebook.com/photography-q-a/t...

(Report comment)

But is a blogger, or an amateur video-you tube star a journalist, a writer, a professional?

I get invited to attend family "vacations" to check out resorts, filled with giftees and perks. I don't particularly like them, but will go on one now and then. The difference is that if something ain't right, I tell it like it is or don't cover the property

Regardless of how much I have been pampered and expensed. I have gone on trips that I have just not written about because thy are not "where they should be" as a destination. The properties, by offering these things to non-professionals they are manipulating the viral coverage they get.

As a professional, I can only hope that this trend will also pass. Perks are a part of the business. But when you consider what it takes to get a good story, time and energy wise both on travel and in writing it up, the professional is a far cry from the amateur.

There is room for both, there will have to be. I am however looking for journalists for my publication.

And yes, properties are going to exploit for positive viral coverage.

Just one more thing to deal with.

Jacquie Kubin
Editor
Donne Tempo Magazine
http://www.donnetempo.com

(Report comment)